home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: idt.unit.no!torrunes
- From: torrunes@idt.unit.no (Tor Rune Skoglund)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,demon.tech.amiga
- Subject: Re: Is MUI processor intensive?
- Date: 6 Feb 1996 16:57:48 GMT
- Organization: The Norwegian University of Science and Technology
- Message-ID: <4f81ac$m2h@due.unit.no>
- References: <9602031422.AA003u7@hectortd.demon.co.uk> <1101.6607T997T2223@crl.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: eik5.idt.unit.no
-
- In article <1101.6607T997T2223@crl.com>, joewald@crl.com (Joseph Waldvogel) writes:
-
- |> Ok, 28Mzh against 14 Mzh, that's not no 4x Faster, that's only 2x faster, Not
- |> noticalble. Then you have to consider the 16-bit A600 to the 32-bit A1200
- |> system. The A600 should just be tossed out! Why throw good money away just to
- |> add a 28Mzh 020 processor? That may make it 4x faster then a Stock A600 when you
-
- You write in a way that make me thing this is flamebait... Adding
- an APollo 620 with fastram to an a600 will make it ~10x faster than
- before which surely will be noticeable for current A600 users.
- (And even more on FPU applications as an 68882 is included.)
- Btw, the Apollo 620 runs on 25 Mhz, not 28.
-
- - Best Regards,
-
- Tor Rune Skoglund DataKompaniet ans
- Tech. Manager/Partner Trondheim Innovation Centre
- Tel: +47 7354 0375 N-7030 Trondheim
- Fax: +47 7394 3861 Norway
- E-mail: datakompaniet@interlink.no
- WWW: http://www.interlink.no/datakompaniet
-